LOUISVILLE'S OWN HEART & VOICE IN IRAQ:

DOUG JOHNSON
Home | Doug's Page
Doug's journal:
  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Peace team | more diaries
Pictures: 1 | war pics | more pics from IPT

Louisville Peace Home

 

Doug's Page--

HISTORY, CULTURE & POLITICAL LINKS

 

Peace Trek

Doug's Iraq Journey for students 

 

 

 

THIRD PILLAR OF ISLAM:

ZAKAT

 

Sunday, March 2, 2003---Day 10

    This morning at our affinity group meeting, we did our customary "check in," where we go around the room and have everybody share about how they're doing.  I shared that I'm scared at times and that I worry I'm not doing enough.  I'm surrounded by highly competent, long-term activists like Charlie Liteky (he did a live interview last night on CNN), photo journalists, etc., and I sometimes fall into the trap of comparing myself to them.  It's not that I don't do anything here.  I do, but still…
     Others shared similar concerns, and Trish said something that really hit home. She said that Western (US) culture is so centered on "doing" rather than "being," that people in the states are considered commodities that are valued only if they produce or are a vehicle for somebody else's production.  Later she and I had lunch and she expounded further, saying that one thing she likes about Arab culture is its emphasis on "being."  She spoke of the pillars of Islam, specifically the pillar "generosity," the idea that the rich have an obligation to take care of the poor, that if the poor go hungry or homeless, the rich are the ones who are shamed.  She went so far as to say that even George Bush, if he were penniless and hungry, would be taken into most homes and fed despite their hatred for him.   People are valued for being people, not for what they do or don't do.
     I suggest that this "pillar" is perceived as a threat to the US.  Along the same line, I agree with Noam Chomsky who says that the US has consistently and systematically targeted countries that are nationalistic, reject US hegemony and offer an alternative model that would be attractive to Third World developing countries and entice them to also reject US domination.  I'm not saying that Iraq necessarily fits that model, nor am I saying that Islamic culture is what sets Iraq apart, but this is a country where people take care of each other, which is a very powerful force.  Iraq is not perfect by any means.  Nor is the US.  But before the Gulf War and 12 years of sanctions, Iraq was prosperous and the wealth was more equitably distributed than in the US.  They had a great educational system and one of the best health care systems in the world.  Even now, long after the US had hoped to annihilate their culture and starve Iraq into submission - thereby demonstrating to the world that resisting US absorption is not a viable model, Iraq survives with dignity.  For example, their food rationing system is equitable and highly efficient (each family gets the equivalent of $25.00/month in food subsidies - which equals eight times the monthly salary of a school teacher.)  Left to prosper of their own abundant natural resources - without being demonized and portrayed as radical terrorists by the US propaganda machine, then bombed continuously, isolated from the world, starved and deprived of everything needed to live with dignity, Iraq would be a formidable economic presence (as it was on it's way to becoming before).  It might serve as a model that other Third World countries - ones that now suffer under US domination - would aspire to emulate.  When George says that he wants to attack Iraq to "protect America's way of life," this is what he really means (although he may not even know it, because he's not the one really running the show in the US).
     Any rational person, however, knows that the "model" theory is secondary when it pertains to Iraq.  The real issue is oil.  America has always wanted control over the world's oil, now the Bush regime thinks it sees an opening, and once the fields are corporate owned, the war will be won, they think.  But they didn't count on the awakening of a new world peace movement to throw a wrench in their war machine.

Amaria Bomb Shelter photo by Doug Hostetter

 

Monday, March 3, 2003---Day 11

I visited the Soldiers’ Museum and the Amaria Shelter this morning.  The Soldiers’ Museum turned out to be an exhibit of guns, military uniforms, medals, etc., instead of what I thought it was - the Iran/Iraq war memorial, Iraq’s version of the Vietnam Wall.  Guns and uniforms are not really my thing, but Amaria turned out to be extraordinary.              

     On February 13, 1991 at 4:30 AM (Iraq time), the US military bombed a shelter where they knew innocent civilians were sleeping.  Two bombs were launched.  The first one penetrated several feet of steel-reinforced concrete, killing all those who occupied the upper level of the shelter.  The second bomb, referred to here as the “burner bomb,” entered the ventilation system and caused the interior temperature to rise to over 400 degrees centigrade, killing those who slept below.  Four hundred and eight people, mostly women and children, were killed.

     To put out the fire, water was poured into the facility, where it pooled into the lower level to a depth of around five feet, leaving a distinct watermark.  But a closer examination showed that this mark was more than just from water.  The victims’ bodies, incinerated in the blast, were reduced to ashes and charred tissue, which was carried by the water to the lower level where it remained clinging to the walls after the water drained away.  What’s left of Amaria now serves as a living memorial for these victims.

     While I was there, a group of talented actors performed a dramatic reenactment that captured the horror and outrage that Iraqis (and much of the world) felt that day.  Afterwards, a television crew from Baghdad (that happened to be there) interviewed me.  They asked how I felt and what I thought after visiting Amaria.  I told them that it’s one thing to think abstractly about a bombing that occurs thousands of miles away, but it’s another to see remains of the bodies and see pictures of babies who were killed.  I added that the US media refers to these babies as “collateral damage,” which dehumanizes them and makes them no more than disposable debris.  The war machine has to dehumanize these babies, because if we could see the faces of those we choose to kill, we the people would stop choosing to kill.  What I didn’t say in the interview is that to intentionally target civilians during war is a violation of international law… a war crime.

     Afterwards, Intesar Al Samarie, the manager of Amaria, invited me to her office where I signed a guest register and we chatted.

 

Tuesday, March 4, 2003---Day 12

   In our affinity group meeting this morning we again dealt with war-preparedness.  Concerned that we're dragging our feet, I suggested we do a tour of the hotel basement - our bomb shelter in the event of war, everyone agreed, and a committee was selected to do the inspection.  I went with Ed, Trish, and Betty Jo, and the kinds of things we looked for were: size and capacity, number of exits, soundness of construction, height, ventilation, dampness on floors, toilet facilities, bedding, and general livability.  Most importantly we wanted to know how to get there quickly, and what could we put in the basement now that would save time when the moment comes, and/or make our long-term stay there more bearable.
     Another consideration is: do we really want to be underground?  If the hotel is hit, do we want to be beneath it?  This is one point where our group is split.  Some want to remain in the hallway on the second floor; some, like myself, feel the basement is better.  Others still, have talked about staying with families in the community that they have gotten to know as a gesture of solidarity.  The problem with this, say some, is that it could pose a risk to these families in the event of civil unrest.  My concern about these multiple plans is that we will separate ourselves and lose contact for long periods, making the weaker of us more vulnerable.  But an important thing to remember is that most Iraqis don't have these choices, nor do they have access to substantial food and supplies as we do.
     Tonight I facilitated the committee meeting for war-preparedness (in case you can't tell, that subject is foremost in our thoughts right now).  We had seven or eight agenda items, the meeting was supposed to last an hour (it lasted two), but the discussion soon focused on whether decision-making should be top-down or by consensus.  It was interesting that the split was mostly along gender lines, the men favoring top-down and the women consensus.  Charlie, a war veteran, made a compelling argument for top-down, saying that he values consensus, but in a time of war split-decisions are necessary and long discussions may not be possible.  (But he was agreeable to consensus if that's what we decided.)  The women argued that many heads are better than one, that by consensus we could come to better decisions in any possible crisis.  The men were shaking their heads no after this comment.  Cliff, the only dissenting male, argued that if we believe in democracy, let's put it to the test now.  I countered that we all want world democracy, but our current crisis comes from not having it, and so radical measures may be needed.  Rapid decision-making that doesn't divide us as a group is my concern.
     In retrospect, I think I was being defensive.  The choice is really democracy vs dictatorship, and I found myself advocating the latter.  It was only later that I thought maybe democracy takes longer only because we've had so little practice with it.  Maybe the women are right.  I grew up under the military model at work and school but I'm open to change.  Our being in Iraq is somewhat experimental after all.
     Changing the subject: I heard today that a US attack in Basra killed six civilians - either yesterday or Sunday.  This has been going on almost daily for several years, yet many people in the states have no idea.  Chris, who traveled into Iraq with me from Jordan, came specifically to help a woman get a visa to travel to the US to do speaking engagements.  Her little boy was killed in Basra in 1999 by a US attack.  I also heard that Turkey's vote not to let the US military use their soil may mean a three week delay in war.  I say that if Turkey continues to hold firm, their people should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

 

 

 

Wednesday, March 5, 2003---Day 13

   I went with Trish and Muhammad (our driver) this afternoon to see the Monument of the Martyrs, an enormous structure honoring the Iraqi soldiers that died in the war with Iran.  From a half-mile away as we approached the site, we saw a blue sphere, shaped like an upside-down heart, broken into two parts, forever divided.


     

    Once we arrived, we passed through a gate into a one hundred yard marble court leading to the monument.  We passed two Iraqi soldiers along the way that were happy to pose for photographs.  At the base of the upside-down broken heart was a fountain that filled a basin, which overflowed into a waterfall that landed one level below.  The stairs we descended wrapped around the waterfall and led us to a dimly lit, subdued, marble interior, where a wall loomed before us. 


     Name after name of dead Iraqi soldiers from the Iran-Iraq war was etched from floor to ceiling on this wall that curved around and seemed to go forever.  Around a million Iraqis, I'm told, died in that war.  From a population of 20 million at the time, the staggering loss was felt in every home in this country, and the senselessness and grief was palpable all around me as the water falling from the broken heart rang in my ears.  I asked Mohammad what he was feeling (he fought and was injured in this war), and he seemed confused at first.  Nobody had ever asked him this question, perhaps.  He said, "it's like Vietnam."  In broken English he explained that he fought because he was told to, and after eight years both countries were destroyed.
     On the way back from the monument we saw truckloads of troops passing, apparently being deployed to somewhere in the city.  Instead of wearing the typical berets, the soldiers were wearing helmets and carrying combat-type rifles (I know nothing about guns).  Trish and I noticed them standing at many places along the road.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Music Against the War

including

Peace Not War CD

 

 

 

 


9:45 PM

I just read today's news, and to say the least I'm not encouraged.  300,000 troops (US/UK) are now amassed around Iraq, a new vote is expected in Turkey to "push through" approval for the US to use their bases, the UN has already drawn up plans for post-war occupation of Iraq, but it was unclear to me how long the US would maintain a military dictatorship before the UN took over.  The Bush regime keeps reiterating that it will act with or without UN approval (without approval is a war crime), yet the US points to Iraq's non-compliance with UN resolutions as justification for war.  How can anyone not see the absurd hypocrisy?!
     I keep trying to imagine what it would look like to have caravans of US military vehicles rolling through Baghdad.  In my mind's eye, it's like Nazi Germany rolling into Poland.  I imagine it would be just as shocking to see foreign troops occupying Louisville Ky.  Both are wonderful, civilized, peaceful cities.  For war to occur in either is unthinkable to me.
     While in the Voices office earlier I found a sheet containing the lyrics of a song that Theresa Kubasak from Chicago wrote.  She played her guitar and sang this song for Charlie and me at the airport before we got on the plane to come here.  The song brought tears to my eyes:

                                           TALKING IRAQ BLUES

Chorus:  We're going to the fertile crescent
               The cradle of civilization
               The land between two rivers
               We're going to Mesopotamia

1. Law of Hammurabi
    The wheel of the Assyrians
    Irrigation and the Sumerians
    The Gardens of the Babylonians

2. Architecture and geometry
    Mathematics and libraries
    The vaulted arch and cuneiform
    Gilgamesh and epic poetry

3. The land of the Prophet Jonah
    Abraham and Sarah
    Ezekiel and Daniel
    The people of the Holy Book

4. House of Wisdom, universities
    Translations and calligraphy
    3 religions live in harmony
    And a shining city named for peace

5. Land of depleted uranium
    Congenital malformations
    Children dying of leukemia
    Isolated, no economy
    Water sickness and the stolen air
    Endless sanctions how they grind and tear
    Mass destructions what we've got here
    For a dozen years the world's not cared.

Chorus: We're going to the fertile crescent
              The cradle of civilization
              The land between two rivers
              We're going to Mesopotamia

6. And we want to take you with us
    As we stand in solidarity
    We're Iraqis and Americans
    And we'll work to stop this war

7. And we want to take you with us
    As we stand in solidarity
    We're Iraqis and internationals
    And we'll work to end these sanctions.

Chorus #3

Last line :  We're going to Iraq